<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thinking About Integrity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.weekendletter.com/thoughts/thinking-about-integrity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.weekendletter.com/thoughts/thinking-about-integrity/</link>
	<description>Notes From Dad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 01:21:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Long Sr</title>
		<link>http://www.weekendletter.com/thoughts/thinking-about-integrity/comment-page-1/#comment-527</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Long Sr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 03:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weekendletter.com/?p=742#comment-527</guid>
		<description>Mathew, I wish to acknowledge your comment.  However, I will not be posting it or my response at this time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mathew, I wish to acknowledge your comment.  However, I will not be posting it or my response at this time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Health Maintenance Through Positive Thinking &#124; Health &#124; safety &#124; insurance</title>
		<link>http://www.weekendletter.com/thoughts/thinking-about-integrity/comment-page-1/#comment-518</link>
		<dc:creator>Health Maintenance Through Positive Thinking &#124; Health &#124; safety &#124; insurance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 10:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weekendletter.com/?p=742#comment-518</guid>
		<description>[...] Thinking About Integrity [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Thinking About Integrity [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Long Sr</title>
		<link>http://www.weekendletter.com/thoughts/thinking-about-integrity/comment-page-1/#comment-510</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Long Sr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 22:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weekendletter.com/?p=742#comment-510</guid>
		<description>Alli,
I understand.  First of all I appreciate your feedback.  The definition of &quot;Integrity&quot; in most of its forms that I found has to do with being complete and consistently adhering to a set of standards, which we embrace.  When I say &quot;we&quot; I am talking about the person embracing the standards.  I used extreme examples in the post to emphasize that point of completeness.  I think we tend to use “Integrity” more subjectively and impose a moral aspect centered on our own beliefs than what the original definition implies.  When we are subjective we are imposing an opinion, usually our own.  
The comment about “Integrity” that was made on Michael’s post where “he needed to show more” of it, was true in the respect that he could have by the true definition of the word.  Michael’s post and ones for the last seven months showed a restraint from his normal “Transparency”.  Had he shown more “Integrity” to follow the standard he embraces with his blog and believes in, there would have been much more revealed of the whole situation.  
Personally, after what I have seen these last months and what he has had to deal with, he has show a lot of “Integrity”, but that is just my subjective opinion based on my own beliefs that we should not fry someone in the media pan.  Well, at least not until they have had a chance to cook their own goose first.  It’s the right thing to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alli,<br />
I understand.  First of all I appreciate your feedback.  The definition of &#8220;Integrity&#8221; in most of its forms that I found has to do with being complete and consistently adhering to a set of standards, which we embrace.  When I say &#8220;we&#8221; I am talking about the person embracing the standards.  I used extreme examples in the post to emphasize that point of completeness.  I think we tend to use “Integrity” more subjectively and impose a moral aspect centered on our own beliefs than what the original definition implies.  When we are subjective we are imposing an opinion, usually our own.<br />
The comment about “Integrity” that was made on Michael’s post where “he needed to show more” of it, was true in the respect that he could have by the true definition of the word.  Michael’s post and ones for the last seven months showed a restraint from his normal “Transparency”.  Had he shown more “Integrity” to follow the standard he embraces with his blog and believes in, there would have been much more revealed of the whole situation.<br />
Personally, after what I have seen these last months and what he has had to deal with, he has show a lot of “Integrity”, but that is just my subjective opinion based on my own beliefs that we should not fry someone in the media pan.  Well, at least not until they have had a chance to cook their own goose first.  It’s the right thing to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alli</title>
		<link>http://www.weekendletter.com/thoughts/thinking-about-integrity/comment-page-1/#comment-506</link>
		<dc:creator>Alli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 06:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weekendletter.com/?p=742#comment-506</guid>
		<description>So if a serial killer values murdering others and embraces those values - he has integrity?  So NOT comparing Michael to a serial killer here - but I am just trying to fully understand your interpretation of the definition :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if a serial killer values murdering others and embraces those values &#8211; he has integrity?  So NOT comparing Michael to a serial killer here &#8211; but I am just trying to fully understand your interpretation of the definition <img src='http://www.weekendletter.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John mitton</title>
		<link>http://www.weekendletter.com/thoughts/thinking-about-integrity/comment-page-1/#comment-497</link>
		<dc:creator>John mitton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 13:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.weekendletter.com/?p=742#comment-497</guid>
		<description>Jon,
  Nice blog.  Having gone through what Michael is going through now has taught me many things about&quot;integrity&quot;. For some people,sticking out a marriage that isn&#039;t working takes integrity. For others, admitting that a marriage isn&#039;t working and going forward also takes integrity. I&#039;m glad that Michael has gone&quot;public&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon,<br />
  Nice blog.  Having gone through what Michael is going through now has taught me many things about&#8221;integrity&#8221;. For some people,sticking out a marriage that isn&#8217;t working takes integrity. For others, admitting that a marriage isn&#8217;t working and going forward also takes integrity. I&#8217;m glad that Michael has gone&#8221;public&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

